The question of using filtering software in the internet censorship debate

It is more frequently used by non-state actors seeking to disrupt services. For general advice on using conversation topics, see our ESL conversation questions article.

The data employed in this study were gathered incontemporaneous with the passage of COPA, and provide a unique insight into the prevailing attitudes about Internet censorship at the time the legislation was passed. I say it is true because it may prevent us from either posting or reading something that may not be approved by the filtering systems that may be implemented hypothetically.

As a system, it is quite generalist, and extremely decentralized. In addition, networking tools and applications that allow the sharing of information related to these motives are themselves subjected to filtering and blocking.

This is achieved by returning a fake "Not Found" error message when an attempt is made to access a blocked website. One might answer the question using only individual moral or philosophical reasoning, not intending to indicate support for government intervention on the Internet. And while there is considerable variation from country to country, the blocking of web sites in a local language is roughly twice that of web sites available only in English or other international languages.

One cannot, therefore, at this level say what individuals will be able to do. Sometimes this exclusion is done to satisfy a legal or other requirement, other times it is purely at the discretion of the portal. One difference is that national borders are more permeable online: It was never known which security service shuttered the site.

So what about PICS? The support for censorship is measured using the following question: This technique might be used during the lead up to an election or some other sensitive period. While pornography, hate speech, or other materials might be deemed offensive to some and acceptable to others, the strong desire to limit access to such material by all or a majority of individuals is at the heart of the Internet censorship debate.

Thus, the data provide insight into the characteristics of those who, inwhere in support of and against Internet censorship, something that has not been provided to date. Inability to transfer this would prevent people from building their own communities with common standards of trust: Report this Argument Con "By disguising the wants and needs, they are infringing upon our rights to free speech, free press, and the right to organize.

I do not believe this is true. Denial-of-service attacks and attacks that deface opposition websites can produce the same result as other blocking techniques, preventing or limiting access to certain websites or other online services, although only for a limited period of time.

For our complete list of topics click here. In DecemberWeChat, a popular mobile communication service among Iranians, became the first mobile application to be filtered on orders of the Working Group to Determine Instances of Criminal Content.

Publishers, authors, and ISPs may be subject to boycotts. Filtering and Censorship One of the threats which posed itself in was of government censorship over information on the Web. A circumvention method could be to use a satellite ISP to access Internet.

PICS allows communities of any size from one up to establish their own criteria. And, because the government is making everything sound fine and dandy, people will not organize; this goes against our Freedom to Protest. Therefore, as long as there is at least one publicly accessible uncensored system, it will often be possible to gain access to the otherwise censored material.

Internet censorship

I, as the contender, not the creator of this debate, had to set the terms under which we are debating. Blocked domain names are not resolved, or an incorrect IP address is returned via DNS hijacking or other means.Censorship is the moral or legislative process by which society “agrees” to limit what an individual can do, say, think, or see.

Recent attempts to regulate, i.e., censor, what is viewed on the Internet have polarized the general mi-centre.comunately, beyond the anecdotal, the characteristics of those who support Internet censorship are unknown.

The Question of Using Filtering Software in the Internet Censorship Debate PAGES 8. WORDS 3, View Full Essay.

Internet Censorship

More essays like this: internet censorship, using filtering software, internet censorship debate. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University.

You are free to use this material in class. For general advice on using conversation topics, see our ESL conversation questions article. For our complete list of topics click more help on editing teflpedia click add new questions to this page.

Filtering and Censorship.

Internet Censorship and Filtering

Information is powerful stuff. The world has been enthralled by the power which the Web, the universe of accessible information, gives to people and to groups working and playing together.

Internet censorship circumvention is the processes used by technologically savvy Internet users to bypass the technical aspects of Internet filtering and gain access to the otherwise censored material.

The Internet first became available in Iran in with the start of dial-up services. Over the next few years, there were no clear guidelines for filtering sites and filtering remained relatively limited, with only intermittent instances of .

The question of using filtering software in the internet censorship debate
Rated 5/5 based on 55 review